data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ecbfb/ecbfb240cefc5f49d94260d7cfd2092e905d86a6" alt=""
(Pam's House Blend via Joe.My.God.)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/24545/24545e9d4480cdd1de80d6213fe81daaa361251f" alt=""
As this picture shows, it's really not about taxes at all; it's about projecting their own ignorant, hardcore fascist beliefs onto someone they hate.
(HuffPo via Joe.My.God.)
A gay man's view of the world from down Texas way
C I V I L M A R R I A G E I S A C I V I L R I G H T.A N D N O W I T ' S T H E L A W O F T H E L A N D.
2 comments:
I don't think either of those would be allowed here. They would break some incitement law.
From reading British papers, I gather that is the case. But we have a much more robust concept and tradition of free speech over here, and I think that's the better way, myself.
Let people talk and spew all they want; at the end of the day, what does it matter, if the equal protection of the laws is rigorously enforced - liberty and justice for *all.*
Apart from personal libels or shouting Fire! in a crowded theater, speech ought to be free, right or wrong. Our Founding Fathers were very firm on this point: they believed truth would crowd out lies in the marketplace of ideas. Sometimes it takes a while, but that does seem to work in the long run.
To legislate otherwise smacks of Thoughcrime, in my view. If I muzzle Johnny today, he may slap a gag on me tomorrow.
Better to let the poisons out, where they will dissipate in the sunshine and fresh air, than keep them hidden and festering.
Post a Comment