C I V I L    M A R R I A G E    I S    A    C I V I L    R I G H T.

A N D N O W I T ' S T H E L A W O F T H E L A N D.


Showing posts with label NDP. Show all posts
Showing posts with label NDP. Show all posts

Thursday, April 28, 2011

"Orange Crush" Making Big Waves in Canada

Today's latest chart of election polling, from CTV.com

Your Head Trucker admires a great many things about Canada, not the least of which is their public healthcare system, as well as their legalization of same-sex marriage back in 2005.  So I take a friendly interest in the political happenings of our neighbor to the north; and this week, the rather placid (by American standards) political waters are rising fast in what might turn out to be an unexpected tsunami that will reshape the landscape for some time to come. 

It appears that the New Democratic Party (softcore Socialists, shhhh!), led by Jack Layton, hitherto always in third place, is riding a wave of disgust with politics-as-usual that might put them into office as the official Opposition for the first time ever at the national level.  Experienced pundits say there's slim-to-no chance of Layton becoming Prime Minister - but there is a chance that Conservative leader Stephen Harper might lose his grip on the office somehow, and the Liberals could be reduced to third-party status for the first time since Confederation in 1867, a major upset - all depending on just how the election returns shape up on Monday, May 2.

Speaking of which, they've only been campaigning since the end of March up there:  Canadian elections last only about 5 or 6 weeks.  OMG, isn't that a blessed thought?

Anyway, here's a clip of the Canadian leader's debate that was held a couple of weeks ago.  Your Head Trucker watched the whole thing on youtube, and this short video montage is a fair representation of the tone of the whole.  One Canadian journalist described it as something like "Jack Layton, a smiling, postive guy surrounded by three angry men," which is about right. 



Harper, as you'll see, tries to smile angelically and play the abused-but-saintly leader, but don't be fooled:  he came into office five years ago pledging to revoke the marriage-equality law.  Some people up there call him the George W. Bush of Canada, for that and other reasons.  But fortunately, when he tried to reopen the issue, Parliament voted down his nasty plan, 175-123, a moment your Head Trucker watched on live television and will never forget:  imagine a nation's elected representatives resoundingly approving, for the third time in three years, under three different prime ministers, equality and justice for all.

What a concept.  Imagine!

The NDP was solidly in favor of gay rights on that and all other occasions.  I like Jack; he's a politician, but he seems very sincere, very down to earth, and clear on what's the right thing to do.  Give him a try, google up the NDP platform, see what you think. 

Below, Layton in an iconic picture saluting his supporters at a rally in Winnipeg yesterday, brandishing his cane.  He's recovering from both prostate surgery as a well as a busted leg, but he's a scappy guy.  Good luck to him.  Maybe Canada, at least, will find some Change they can believe in.

Thursday, June 18, 2009

Reax: Polis, Aravosis, Frank

CBS interviews Jared Polis and John Aravosis:


Watch CBS Videos Online

Excerpt from a reader's comment on Americablog about the Barney Frank flip-flop:
By making such a crass and transparently political calculation, Barney Frank has committed the same mistake that Mattachine made. He has overvalued his relationship with the Democratic power establishment over his relationship with our community - and in so doing, he has forgotten his roots. Had he spoken up for our community by giving voice to the pain that ordinary gay couples feel over DOMA, we would have rallied around him as a natural leader. But by defending Obama's indefensible legal brief, he has placed himself at odds with his own community. He will not lose everyone's support - our community is not monolithic - but at this very moment in history, Barney Frank was handed a rare opportunity to rise to the occasion and become a truly great leader. Instead, he has revealed himself as just another crass politician.

The old wineskin is incapable of containing the new wine.
What I Say: I like Barney a lot, he's shrewd as hell and tells it like it is. But just as he said the other day that the President "has made a big mistake," so too I think Barney has now made a great error. He's still playing the political ballgame after the game has been called.

And furthermore, your Head Trucker is amazed at the utter insanity of some bloggers and commenters to the effect of, Well I'll vote for the Republicans next time. That's just bizarre, and totally not comprehending reality.

Who in their right fucking mind could possibly vote for the party of Limbaugh, Cheney, Palin, Pat Robertson, Jerry Falwell, Sally Kern, Larry Craig, Ted Haggart, and oh let's not forget George W. Bush?? It's the party of torture and unlimited executive power, remember?

Please, Mary, put the pipe down and snap out of it. The Republican party is in its death throes, anyway; they won't go quietly, but they are the dinosaurs of the 21st century. Supporting a quasi-fascist party is definitely not the way to go, boys. You really want to be singing "We're here, we're queer" as you're marched into a metaphorical detention camp?

Either we have to pile on the heat to get the Dems' attention; or somehow a new and vote-winning party, more responsive and more concerned about all the people's needs - not just the gays' - has got to arise here. We've all been very well trained to think of American politics as "either-or"; but maybe it doesn't have to be either Dems or Repubs, maybe there's room for more and better in our political system. Certainly, a massive turn to a new, more progressive outfit would get the Dems' attention in a hurry.

Sometimes what looks like a very small, almost trivial incident, can set in motion a huge movement. It occurs to me that this little debacle could be the crack in the dam, a historic turning point in the political history of this country - if the Dems don't act fast to make good on their fine talk and promises. It's about civil rights, people - it's not optional anymore, it's required.

Or else the Dems just might follow the Republicans into extinction one day. I've already recommended that you fellas take a look at Canada's New Democratic Party. Give some thought also to the platform of Britain's Liberal Democrats, and see if you like what you read. The names aren't important, it's the philosophy the party stands for.

I'm not a prophet or a political wizard, but one thing I do know: Change has come to America. And maybe a bigger change than anyone really expected. Think it over.
Promoting social liberalism, Lib Dems seek to minimise state intervention in personal affairs: they oppose what they call the 'nanny state'. Their president's book of office is John Stuart Mill's On Liberty, which defined the harm principle of law. While objecting to state limitations of individual rights, they favour a welfare state that provides for the necessities and amenities of life. . . . strong environmentalist values . . . renewable energy . . . taxing the rich more . . . power to the people.
--Wikipedia

Tuesday, June 16, 2009

Where to Go from Here?

It's very late here - I'm hungry, I'm tired, and I'm tired of thinking about the enormous betrayal of my faith by a man I believed in.

It seems very familiar, somehow.
When you meet a boy that you like a lot
And you fall in love, but he loves you not,
If a flame should start while you hold him near
Better keep your heart out of danger, dear.

For the way of love is a way of woe . . .
Oh hell, I could say a lot about that scenario. And this one, which is just like it. But I want my supper, I want to watch a movie, my head's foggy and a little achy. So I'll just say this.

Seems as if in the past few days, we've all come to realize we were defrauded; not just by Obama, but by the Democrats in general.

And I've always, all my life, voted the Democratic ticket. But ya know, guys, when you keep tricking with the same kind of guy, and it keeps turning out the same damn way every time, that's kinda stupid to keep going on like that and expecting different results, don't you think?

What I'm seeing is not what I thought the Democratic party was all about: it's Republican Lite. Same old make-nice, and don't-rock-the-boat, and be-calm-and-just-wait.

To quote David Mixner, I say Bullshit.

The two-party system has worked for a long time; we could argue over how well it's worked in various ways, but what I can say for a certainty is that it's not working for me, not like we've just seen in the past week.

So why don't we stop the madness and create a new party that will meet the needs of liberal, progressive, fair-minded people?

If all this had happened at a younger, more hotblooded time in my life, I'd be ready to raise the red flag now and go the Socialist route. Never thought I'd say that, it goes against every instinct of my Southern upbringing; but I've come to realize that my Southern upbringing was for shit, politically speaking.

But age does bring wisdom born of experience. I don't want to blow up the building, though, I want to shore it up and renovate it, make it livable. And like Orwell, I have an innate contempt and horror of "smelly little orthodoxies" that sound good but like cheap toilet paper, fall apart just when you rely on them most.

The Libertarians have never appealed to me in the least as something I could support; yeah I agree most of the time most people should just be left the hell alone, live and let live. But the Libertarians that I've read seem to go way to far with that thought; the stupid notion that if you just take away all the nasty laws, everybody will just naturally do the right thing.

FAIL. That's exactly what the Republicans let Big Business do these last 20-some years, and you see where that has gotten us.

What I do believe is what the ancient Greeks said: excellence is the middle way (the Golden Mean) between excess on either side.

I don't expect any man, woman, party, or government ever to produce Utopia here on earth. It's just not happening; humans are a flawed mixture of both good and evil - me, you, everybody. Anything, anything whatever that we create is also going to be a mixture of good and bad.

But within the confines of the rule of law and the wisdom of the Founding Fathers, I do have a glimmer of a vision of a much more just, more fair, more equal, more compassionate society. Perfection is not to be looked for, but a great improvement certainly can be made.

I'm looking for a party that will seek to make government work for more people's benefit; that is highly tolerant of individual freedoms, and uses the power of government not to run everything in sight, but to wisely regulate the agents of prosperity and well-being.

Well it's too late at night for me to wade further into these philosophical waters, and I know mine is just a lone voice crying into the wind here. But I hope maybe one or two of you who read this will think about a real alternative to the current parties, a workable, embraceable alternative. Read more about the possibilities. Talk about it with a friend or two.

They say a butterfly fluttering its wings in the jungles of Brazil can start a motion that produces a hurricane in the Atlantic, theoretically. At least that's an intriguing theory. So who knows where my little thought my lead, somewhere, sometime.

For a start, look at what the New Democratic Party in Canada stands for, and see if that's more to your liking than what the major parties here are handing out. The NDP has never run the federal government up there, but they do control several provincial legislatures, and they are very gay-friendly, among other things. Think about it:
The NDP grew from populist, agrarian and democratic socialist roots. While the party is secular and pluralistic, it has a longstanding relationship with the Christian left and the Social Gospel movement, particularly the United Church of Canada. However, the federal party has broadened to include concerns of the New Left, which advocates issues such as gay rights, peace, and environmental protection.

New Democrats today advocate, among other things:

- Sweeping environmental protection
- National water safety standards
- Increasing corporate taxes
- Reducing poverty in Canada
- Human rights protection
- Expanded high-quality public transportation
- Public health care including expanded dental and prescription drug coverage,
- Social assistance policies that reflects citizens' needs and assists their re-entry to the work force
- Gender equality and equal rights for gays, lesbians, and minorities
- Abolish the un-elected Senate and ensure more proportional representation
- Workers' rights including raising the minimum wage to at least keep up with the cost of living
- Aboriginal treaty, land, and constitutional rights
- A foreign policy that emphasizes diplomacy, peacekeeping and humanitarian aid instead of offensive military action
- Renegotiating the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA)
- One wing is focused on ending the Canadian War on Drugs and legalizing recreational drugs

We don't have to keep the same old two parties in power here. There is an alternative; it's the one we create.

We are the ones we've been waiting for.

Related Posts with Thumbnails