C I V I L    M A R R I A G E    I S    A    C I V I L    R I G H T.

A N D N O W I T ' S T H E L A W O F T H E L A N D.


Sunday, June 7, 2009

In Memoriam: D-Day


It was a huge, huge thing back there in 1944. The whole country, indeed the whole world, had been waiting anxiously for many weeks to hear that the invasion of Europe had begun. Nobody knew when or where it would be, but everyone knew casualties would be high; and every family had somebody in the service. You can listen to the very first reports from CBS News here, beginning before dawn that day; it's a radio broadcast, natch. The first confirmation of the invasion comes at the :49 minute mark.

My dad was in the Army Air Corps, stationed in England. He didn't go over on D-Day, it was a few weeks afterward when they were ready to start setting up regular air bases. But even so, they still got bombed and attacked, and had to shoot back. Like most guys from that war, he rarely ever spoke about what he'd seen and done. He was one of the lucky ones who came back alive and in one piece, ready to take up his GI benefits and go to college. A lot of men weren't so lucky. Yet their victory remains a glorious one. Peace to their ashes, from a grateful world.

(Milt Priggee via The Daily Slab)

Sunday Drive: Sursum Corda

Click to enlarge, you won't be disappointed:






The roommate and I keep talking about making a run up to OKC to see the Dale Chihuly installation they have there. Think it would be a pretty cool trip, don't you guys?

What a piece of work is a man! how noble in reason, how infinite in faculty, in form and moving how express and admirable, in action how like an angel, in apprehension how like a god, the beauty of the world, the paragon of animals . . . .
- Hamlet, Act II, scene ii.

Saturday, June 6, 2009

Afternoon Drive: Men and Their Horses



(Photos: honk to Bend Over Country)

Audio track is missing for the interviews, dammit, but this has some studly cowboy types and some funny stuff too:



Y'all have a good one.

More Fun with Words

Click to enlarge:

If you squint, you can see the dreaded Jabberwock.

Seven songs by Simon & Garfunkel.

Go try out Wordle.net for yourself; but beware, it's addictive.

Friday, June 5, 2009

German Penguins Violate Natural Law

Papa Z and Daddy V shamelessly flaunting their
unnatural lifestyle in front of God and everybody

. . . and they are proud as punch, too. The two male Humboldt penguins, named Vielpunkt and Z (yeah, just Z . . . how cool is that), have hatched their first egg together, one that was abandoned by a morally-correct, traditional-values female who couldn't be bothered with the job. (I heard she was just a slut, btw.)

V and Z, on the other hand, despite the shame of (horrors!) succumbing to their disordered appetites - and they are one of three gay couples at the Bremerhaven Zoo - are being, like the greatest dads ever: "Since the chick arrived, they have been behaving just as you would expect a heterosexual couple to do," the zoo said in a statement. One or the other guards the chick at all times, and both take turns with the round-the-clock feeding of pre-chewed fish mash to the little bundle of joy.

Guess he or she is still a bit young for herring snacks. Zookeepers won't know the chick's gender identity until its a little older and can be separated from its dads for inspection.

Penguin gaiety is getting to be quite the thing all around the world, it seems. Another famous couple is Roy and Silo at the Central Park Zoo in New York City, who famously hatched and raised little Tango. And just last year, another pair of penguin dads were even given a wedding by their keepers at the Polar Land Zoo in Harbin, China.

OMG, is penguin perversity spreading all around the world? Don't they know what they are doing is like, totally unnatural? Why don't they follow the sacred teachings of the church, repent and live a normal life, like the Bible commands? No doubt God's pissed as hell about it too: just wait and see, a hurricane will probably strike Bremerhaven any time now.

Oh, and think of the children! The poor, innocent little penguin chicks, having to grow up in a same-sex household, without proper role models. How will they ever learn to be normal adults with that kind of upbringing!

I bet Deacon Fournier and all his ilk will be crying in their hankies when they read this story. Gee, ain't that a shame?

Lesbians Succumb to Disordered Appetites

. . . at least that's the headline the fatheaded Deacon Fournier (see next post) would probably write for this report on the cruelty of U.S. immigration laws - a real couple involved in a real tragedy right now, not an imaginary "absurd example":



On June 3, the Senate Judiciary Committee held the first hearing on the Uniting American Families Act, which would allow gays and lesbians to sponsor their same-sex partners for immigration. Find out more here and here, then write your Senators and let them know what you think.

Do something.

How to Skin a Pig

Joe.My.God. posted this piece of asshattery today, written by Catholic deacon Keith Fournier (who could just as easily have been a Baptist, Mormon, etc., etc.); your Head Trucker can't resist the temptation to tear it apart. My comments are in italics:

Fournier writes: Some maintain that same sex attraction is a genetic predisposition. This is disputed.

Science has yet to discover the precise mechanism that causes people to land here or there on the sexual spectrum, true; but the growing weight of evidence suggests that it is something you're born with. It's not disputed by anyone who actually is gay, and knows what the fuck they are talking about, unlike homophobes who arrogantly assume they know all about something they have never experienced - or closet cases, like some Catholic clergy, desperate to talk themselves into believing their church doctrine came straight from the mouth of God.

Even if it were the case, that does not give homosexual activity any more of a claim to being given a special civil rights status.

Whoa, bubba, you just tripped and fell twice in one sentence. First, where do you get this word "special" from? Nobody, but nobody is asking for gays to have "special" rights; that's a buzzword used by rightwingers to twist people's minds against us. What we are asking for is what women, blacks, Native Americans, Asian Americans, and every other group has asked for: EQUAL rights, fuckhead. Right here and now, in my little Texas town, no straight man can be fired simply for being heterosexual. I could, theoretically, be fired from my job at any moment simply for being gay - and I would have no recourse whatsoever, no protection at all, under the laws of either the Lone Star State or those of the United States. Neither I nor any of my gay brothers and sisters want "special" rights, we just want the SAME fucking rights you have, bud: to be judged on our merits, not prejudged on our home life.

Second, notice that you seem to come very close to suggesting that inborn traits are not deserving of any protection or recognition in law. Oh really? So there's no need for any civil rights laws to protect black people merely because they are born with dark skin pigment? No need for equal pay/equal work laws for women because they are born with female equipment? You dumb shit, you don't even know what you're implying here.


Should we really give disordered appetites civil rights status under the law?

Um, so who exactly is it that decided and determined that my "appetite" - for what, you don't say - is "disordered," hmm? That phrase comes straight from the pronouncements of your homo-hating church, which has been actively condemning, outlawing, and persecuting gays ever since Constantine made Catholicism the state religion of the Roman Empire in A.D. 325. And you guys did such a great job of ingraining homophobia into Western culture (in contrast to the relaxed and even supportive attitudes of the Greeks and Romans for many centuries before there ever was a Christian church) that most other churches and governments have followed your lead all these 1700 years, until just recently. (Your church and others did the same thing to the Jews, whipping up irrational anti-Semitism and hatred against them starting from the writings of Paul all the way down the line to the Holocaust.) But guess what, bud: your mythology is not my reality.

Let’s consider an absurd example.

Okay, a really dipshit rhetorical move on your part. What exactly does an "absurd" example - by definition, something imaginary and grossly ridiculous - have to do with the real-life people you are supposedly discussing here? Answer: your arguments are just as fucking absurd as your examples.

I have struggled most of my life with fighting obesity. I am on the 'winning end' lately, but just give me another Holiday!

So in other words, you are a closet case for obesity; just like oh, say, Ted Haggard and Larry Craig, people of that ilk. You have a desperate need to look good and get applause, when all the time your true nature is eating you up inside, so when you find a chance and think you have a great excuse, you just go hog wild - isn't that right, fat boy? And then make a great big show of how repentant you are: Oh, I have sinned, I couldn't help myself, woe is me - but I'll be good from now on! At least until next time. . . .

A very good argument can be made that obesity also has a genetic predisposition. However, I will fight it my whole life because it is unhealthy. It is a disordered appetite.

More breast-beating: see what a terrible sinner I am! And in parentheses: (see what a GOOD boy I am! I did it, but I said I was sorry, so that makes it okay!)

Whatsa matter, Porky? You don't think God can love you if you're overweight? You don't believe fat people go to heaven? You think God made you and put you here just to live a life of constant self-denial, struggle, pain, and self-hatred, don't you. But guess what: nothing you do can ever satisify that God. Nothing is ever good enough for Him. Because He sees everything, and He is keeping a list of all those midnight Twinkies you scarf down when you think nobody's looking, all those little extra pats of butter on your biscuits, even the extra sugar packet you stealthily empty into your coffee cup, making it look like you're only using one.

That God is never going to be satisfied with you. You should come over sometime and meet my God. He's cool, we hang out all the time. Sometimes we pick up a dozen doughnuts and end up fighting over who gets the last one. He don't even notice how much I weigh, I don't think He ever thinks about it. He just likes to sit around and drink java, and he tells me things like "it's not what goes into a man that defiles him, it's what comes out of him." He's like the coolest friend ever; you should get to know Him, I think you'd like Him.


Should we as a Nation decide that fat people have a civil right to be fat?

Whoa, whoa, WHOA buddy. Even granting that you are admittedly pursuing a totally absurd line of argument, here you have crossed over from imaginary to psychotic. What are you saying? That there is no "right to be fat"? That there is some law that says, you can only weigh this much, and not an ounce more? Really, bud? Really?? Or is that just the way you would like things to be in your imagination nation? I can easily picture you with your totalitarian instincts in your first act as the Amerikan Furhrer: "Public Order Number One: No femmes, no fats! Seig heil!"

What I weigh is none of your fucking business, you got that bud? You don't own me or my body, I do. So back up and shut up. You ain't anywhere near perfect yourself.


Should those who insist that they resist that 'genetic predisposition' to overeat be called Fata-phobic?

The answer is Yes, you dictatorial bastard. The problem is with your use (and I do believe this sentence reveals your true subconscious attitude) of the word insist. You would love to be able to force people to do what you want, wouldn't you? You fantasize about bending people to your will, stuffing them into the tight, cramped box of perfection, don't you? Bite me. Fat prejudice is a cruel, hurtful fact perpetrated by I'm-so-good-look-at-me types like you, who don't fucking care who they hurt, as long as they get to elevate themselves by looking down on someone else. PBS Frontline did a whole show on this problem. Not that you would care, right bud?

Disordered appetites - and the actions engaged in by those who give into them – simply should not be called civil rights.

Once again, you control the argument by making up your own definitions. If brother Bob meets a wonderful girl, falls in love, sets up house together, and lives a happy life with her, tell me friend, why do you have to call it an "appetite" when I meet a wonderful guy, fall in love, set up house together, and live a happy life with him? Notice that you don't reduce all of Bob's identity, motivations, actions, and hopes to the level of a craving for SweeTarts, do you? But you reduce, diminish, mock, and marginalize all that I am, and all that I might want, down to something as trivial as a sweet tooth. You people have this obsession with sex, as if all a gay person ever does is screw; as if sex is the one and only thing in our lives. With just one word, you dehumanize me; a neat trick, shithead, but nobody's buying it.

Certainly, those who succumb to them should be treated with the human dignity that they deserve and not be discriminated against.

Oh my, the word succumb! Which evokes an image of being drawn, against one's true and better judgment, into a dark and sinful temptation, wrapping its tentacles around your arms and legs, trapping you, pulling you down into a dark and fearsome cavern of helpless degredation and eternal woe! Hmm, is that really how you picture gay people living their lives? Really? Struggling and flailing to no avail against the hand of the big hairy hulking gorilla that clutches you and drags you off to his lair, to do unimaginably abominable things to you, while you scream and beg for mercy?

Hmm, sounds kinda like fun, don't it Mary? It's okay, you can tell me - bet you'd really enjoy that kind of scene, wouldn't ya? If you're seriously interested, I could set you up with a couple guys I know . . . but rhetorically, Miss Thing, I'm afraid it's another FAIL.


However, that is because they are human not because of their behavior!

Much as I hate to admit it, for the first time in this tirade, you are actually starting to make sense here, boi. That is EXACTLY our point. We are just as human as you, porky, and therefore just exactly as entitled to equal respect and dignity and justice as you are. Well said!

Homosexual sexual acts are simply homosexual sexual acts. Our bodies do not lie, they speak the language written within their constitution and confirmed in the Natural Law which binds us all.

Once again, I have to say how amazed I am that you agree with us so beautifully, hon. Sex is just sex, whichever flavor it happens to be; that is one of many wonderful things that make us all human beings. My body does not lie, it speaks the language written in my consitution, which confirms the true nature of human life: some are attracted to the opposite sex, some to the same sex, some to both. That's reality, real simple.

It's only the Big Lies that you and your outfit - and many similar ones - have been putting out for centuries and centuries, that do not tell the truth, that contradict both reality and nature - all for the sake of controlling the population and keeping them in line with the threat of an angry, vengeful God.

You had me worried when you started, but I'm so glad to see that you came around to clear thinking by the end of your message. Good job, bro! Welcome aboard!

Rachel on Obama's Cairo Speech

Rachel Maddow gives a brilliant analysis of why you and I should be very, very proud of what our President just did in Cairo with so much honesty and, I would even say, humility - such rare things in the political world:

Word Pictures



A couple of arrangements of the most-used words in my "Quo Vadis" essay (next post), created via Wordle.net. How many random sentences can you find in these - like "just lead mr. president" in the top one? (Click to enlarge)

Thursday, June 4, 2009

Quo Vadis, Mr. President?

President Obama Departs White House For Trip To Egypt, Germany And France


The more I reflect upon President Obama's offhand attitude towards the urgency of our struggle for equal dignity and respect, and the equal protection of the laws, the more disappointed I am.

The President's brief comments to Brian Williams, shown in the snippet I posted yesterday, show that he thinks he is a good friend of the gays; and truth to tell, in comparison with his benighted predecessor, we have to consider him a friend, rather than an enemy.

But there are friends, and then there are good friends; people who, in the trite phrase, are "there for you" when you need them; who go to bat for you; who know what you feel, and care.

I don't expect the President to put teh gayz at the very top of his priority list, and I don't think anyone else does; our country and the world are facing several grave crises at the moment that affect everyone's safety and wellbeing. But I do expect gay equality to be on the priority list. Not stuffed in a forgotten file in a back drawer.

I expect the President - based on his own words, his own promises - to give the country a lead on these issues. It's very easy to do: a forceful sentence dropped here and there, a paragraph or two now and then. A clear and repeated statement that equality for LGBT people is and remains an unrelenting goal of this Administration. He doesn't have to show up at protest rallies, he just needs to remind the nation, consistently, that we matter too, that we are also Americans, that our families and our rights are no less important than anyone else's.

Why he is not doing this - it seems he rarely mentions us unless pressed to do so by the media - is a mystery to me, and a deeply hurtful one. I believed the man, I voted for him, I put my confidence in him; he made an implied contract with the gay community, our votes for his promises, and now is the time for him to pay up, in word and deed.

Actions speak even louder than words. Mr. Obama said in the Brian Williams interview that he is not carrying "too much on his plate," that he can and is dealing with all that he should. So what about gay rights, equality, and justice? What has he done so far?

Now, without Googling up anything, just off the top of my head here are the only three concrete actions I recall at this moment that he has taken on our behalf: he directed our United Nations delegation to sign the U.N. declaration against criminalization of homosexuality; he publicly endorsed the passage of the hate-crimes bill in Congress; and he proclaimed June as Gay Pride month.

All well and good; thank you, Mr. President.

But now here is what he has not done, again just off the top of my head here: although Congress passed a law to lift the ban on HIV+ persons entering this country, he and his Administration have yet to implement the law; people are still being turned away at the borders, including 60 Canadians just last week, travelling to an AIDS conference in New York. This situation can be rectified at a moment's notice if the President only gives the word down the chain of command; why has he not done so?

Also, more than 200 gay and lesbian servicemembers have been kicked out of the military just since Inauguaration Day. Not only does this cause great hardship and grief to individuals whose careers have just been trashed, it also weakens our armed forces and to some degree endangers our national security by removing talented, well-trained and motivated people from the ranks. When a reporter can get anyone in the Administration to comment on DADT, the vague, reluctant answer is that, oh, it would take an act of Congress to overturn that, and lots and lots of consultations with the generals and admirals, etc., etc.

I say that's bullshit, a patently obvious evasion of the issue. I don't believe it. Even though I do see the advantage of building consensus and persuading the top brass on this issue, still, the plain fact is that the President is Commander-in-Chief; he can do what Truman did for blacks, and issue an executive order at any time to stop these discharges, or at the very least, suspend the process until a new policy can be worked out.

But you see, he's not doing that, and I predict he's not going to, despite the emphasis from him and the First Lady on their care for military families and all that. It's straight families they are concerned about. You notice that he has not even come out and said, okay, by the end of this year (or whenever, but a definite time), we are going to organize a conference with military chiefs, we want to discuss points A, B, and C, our goal for gays in the military is X, Y, or Z. No, there is no plan, no timetable, no vision about DADT: nothing from this Administration.

Another point where Obama is missing the mark he set for himself is when he says - as in the clip from last night - yes, I want gay couples to have access to federal rights. Well, okay, fine: what exactly are you going to do to get us that access, Mr. President?

Does your Administration have a federal gay-rights statute in mind, a draft of a bill to send to Congress; how about an outline of a proposal for such a bill? Do you have the ghost of an intention to do one concrete thing to get us access to the equal protection of the laws guaranteed to all citizens by the 14th Amendment - specifically, the 1,138 federal rights and privileges conferred by law upon all straight married couples everywhere but specifically and intentionally denied - by DOMA - to any gay couples? Do you?

Now I'm a realist; I do understand that as a popular, newly-elected President, with both houses of Congress controlled by his party, that Obama's great push this year - and he will never again have so much power and influence over what happens, because that's the nature of politics - his great push is to save the economy, manage the warfare abroad, and nail down his goals for healthcare, education, and energy policies before this year is out. All that is well and good, and indeed utterly necessary for the happiness, security, and wellbeing of us all. And I do confidently foresee that history will look back on his term of office as a time of magnificent achievements in all these areas, and more.

But ours is a struggle for civil rights: it is not optional, it is not marginal, it is not ignorable. Our cause is just, our goal is justice, and our time is now. Not tomorrow, not someday, not whenever a convenient moment arrives. It is now, and not later.

As the President himself said yesterday, alluding to Muslim-Americans, but in words that also pertain directly to us:

We were founded upon the ideal that all are created equal, and we have shed blood and struggled for centuries to give meaning to those words – within our borders, and around the world. We are shaped by every culture, drawn from every end of the Earth, and dedicated to a simple concept: E pluribus unum: "Out of many, one."
We gays are also part of the many, Mr. President. While you are reaching out and inspiring other people, other groups, all around the world - don't forget us. We are standing right here in front of you. Do you stand beside us? We would follow you - but will you lead?

Quo vadis? Whither goest thou, Mr. President?


* * * * *

The President gave a magnificent speech yesterday in Cairo, which will be long remembered and is well worth reading. I believe his honesty and humility will go a long way towards repairing the catastrophic mistakes of his predecessor in that region. The full text is here, but I've pulled out a few notable excerpts, which I think have a bearing, in a roundabout way, on our situation as gays and lesbians seeking equality in this country:
I have come here to seek a new beginning between the United States and Muslims around the world; one based upon mutual interest and mutual respect; and one based upon the truth that America and Islam are not exclusive, and need not be in competition. Instead, they overlap, and share common principles – principles of justice and progress; tolerance and the dignity of all human beings.

I do so recognizing that change cannot happen overnight. No single speech can eradicate years of mistrust, nor can I answer in the time that I have all the complex questions that brought us to this point. But I am convinced that in order to move forward, we must say openly the things we hold in our hearts, and that too often are said only behind closed doors. There must be a sustained effort to listen to each other; to learn from each other; to respect one another; and to seek common ground. . . .

For centuries, black people in America suffered the lash of the whip as slaves and the humiliation of segregation. But it was not violence that won full and equal rights. It was a peaceful and determined insistence upon the ideals at the center of America's founding. . . .

America does not presume to know what is best for everyone, just as we would not presume to pick the outcome of a peaceful election. But I do have an unyielding belief that all people yearn for certain things: the ability to speak your mind and have a say in how you are governed; confidence in the rule of law and the equal administration of justice; government that is transparent and doesn't steal from the people; the freedom to live as you choose. Those are not just American ideas, they are human rights, and that is why we will support them everywhere. . . .

All of us share this world for but a brief moment in time. The question is whether we spend that time focused on what pushes us apart, or whether we commit ourselves to an effort – a sustained effort – to find common ground, to focus on the future we seek for our children, and to respect the dignity of all human beings.

It is easier to start wars than to end them. It is easier to blame others than to look inward; to see what is different about someone than to find the things we share. But we should choose the right path, not just the easy path. There is also one rule that lies at the heart of every religion – that we do unto others as we would have them do unto us. This truth transcends nations and peoples – a belief that isn't new; that isn't black or white or brown; that isn't Christian, or Muslim or Jew. It's a belief that pulsed in the cradle of civilization, and that still beats in the heart of billions. It's a faith in other people, and it's what brought me here today.

Wednesday, June 3, 2009

Obama Speaks Out on Gay Marriage?

. . . um, not so much:

Our fierce advocate sure is doing a lot of pussyfooting on this and all the other gay rights issues. He's like, go away, it's not my job.

I'm starting to feel really ticked here. What about you?

BTW, you can see the full 2-hour Brian Williams NBC special on life in the Obama White House here.
Related Posts with Thumbnails